2025
Proposing more concise and clearer regulations.
A better format for regulations is important because it improves clarity, usability, and compliance. Well-structured regulations are easier for stakeholders to understand, follow, and implement, which can enhance their effectiveness.
Easier Interpretation: Clear formatting minimizes ambiguity, reducing the risk of misinterpretation by regulated entities or enforcement authorities.
Separation of Core and Context: Distinguishing enforceable rules from supplementary information ensures the focus is on what must be followed.
Simplifies Requirements: Straightforward formatting reduces confusion, helping stakeholders meet their obligations more effectively.
Reduces Administrative Burden: Clear presentation lowers the need for clarifications, amendments, or legal disputes.
Quicker Navigation: Structured content allows readers to find relevant sections or provisions efficiently.
Consistency Across Regulations: Standard formatting makes it easier for stakeholders to understand and compare regulations.
Developing a better regulatory standard involves creating a streamlined, modernized approach that prioritizes clarity, accessibility, and adaptability. Here's a step-by-step outline of that approach:
1. Analyze Current Challenges
Inconsistent Formats: Different structures make it difficult to navigate and understand regulations.
Length and Complexity: Excessively verbose language and redundant sections hinder comprehension.
Physical or Scanned Formats: Scanned documents lack digital functionality, making search and access cumbersome.
Outdated Delivery: Regulations that aren't digitally native limit accessibility and engagement.
2. Define Core Objectives
Clarity: Ensure that core provisions are concise and easy to understand.
Accessibility: Make regulations widely available in digital formats optimized for all devices.
Standardization: Establish a uniform structure that applies across all regulatory documents.
Usability: Enable easy navigation, keyword searches, and interconnectivity between related rules.
3. Establish a Digital-First Framework
Digital-Native Formats: Draft regulations in machine-readable formats like HTML or XML to enable dynamic access and interactivity.
Searchable Content: Use metadata and tagging to facilitate keyword searches and cross-referencing.
Interactive Features: Include hyperlinks, collapsible sections, and embedded tools for easier navigation.
4. Create a Standardized Regulatory Template
Develop a universal template that separates critical content from supplementary materials:
Title and Purpose: Clearly state the regulation's name, scope, and objectives.
Core Provisions: Include enforceable rules in clear, actionable language.
Definitions: Provide a glossary of terms for consistency.
Preamble or Background: Offer context, rationale, and historical development.
Annotations and Guidance: Include non-binding explanations, industry examples, and FAQs.
Version History and Updates: Track amendments with timestamps and clear version control.
5. Simplify Language
Plain Language Principles: Avoid legal jargon and overly technical terms where possible.
Consistent Terminology: Use standardized terms to reduce confusion.
Short Sentences: Keep sentences concise and focused on a single idea.
6. Leverage Modern Technology
Regulatory Platforms: Host regulations on centralized online platforms that allow for real-time updates and public access.
Version Control Systems: Maintain a clear history of changes and allow side-by-side comparisons.
AI and Machine Learning: Use AI tools to assist with drafting, cross-referencing, and summarizing complex rules.
7. Engage Stakeholders
Collaborative Drafting: Involve regulators, industry experts, and public stakeholders early in the process.
Public Consultation: Use open forums and digital platforms to gather feedback during drafting.
Transparency: Clearly document decision-making processes and stakeholder contributions.
8. Train Regulators and Stakeholders
Workshops and Guidelines: Provide training on the new standard to ensure smooth adoption.
Ongoing Support: Offer tools and resources to help users navigate the new format.
9. Implement and Iterate
Pilot Projects: Test the new standard on a few regulations before full rollout.
Continuous Feedback: Regularly update the framework based on user feedback and evolving needs.
Performance Metrics: Track accessibility, clarity, and compliance rates to measure effectiveness.
Expected Result
The final result should be a living regulatory ecosystem where regulations are:
Easy to find and navigate online.
Clear in their structure and requirements.
Designed to evolve with minimal disruption.
This modernized approach ensures that regulations are more effective, equitable, and future-ready.
1
In Progress
Adopt 6 GHz for unlicensed indoor RLAN use.
5925-6425 MHz, ≤80 MHz channel width, Low Power Indoor-only (LPI) ≤23 dBm EIRP.
2.4 GHz
≤40 MHz
≤27 dBm EIRP
2400-2483.5 MHz
5 GHz
≤80 MHz
≤24 dBm EIRP
5150-5350 MHz
5350-5725 MHz
5725-5825 MHz
6 GHz
≤160 MHz
≤23 dBm EIRP
5925-6425 MHz
6425-7115 MHz
Notes
This update introduces support for the lower 6 GHz band, adding 24 20 MHz channels—an approach adopted by 81% of countries with 6 GHz support. A maximum channel width of 80 MHz will ensure sufficient high-performance channels to meet Indonesia's dense deployment needs. By adopting the 6 GHz band and unlocking the full potential of Wi-Fi 7, Indonesia will experience previously unattainable speeds and improved spectrum efficiency.
Status
In-progress, targeting approval by Q1 2025.
Advancing technology in Indonesia.